<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Blurring Borders - Latest Comments in Musings on Individual Thinkers and Social Knowledge</title><link>http://blurringborders.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:37:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Musings on Individual Thinkers and Social Knowledge</title><link>http://blurringborders.com/?p=157#comment-3052609</link><description>I think the medium influences us, but it is far from deterministic. It has a tendency, but it is not going to happen for everyone and to the same degree.  But, yes, as for the general sentiment, I agree that the medium matters.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:37:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Musings on Individual Thinkers and Social Knowledge</title><link>http://blurringborders.com/?p=157#comment-3052608</link><description>I disagree with you over your belief that the medium of information is irrelevant.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everything, including medium, matters. There are going to be differences in the way our mind functions if it solely reads print newspapers versus online news versus random blog posts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, this difference may be for better or worse.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unlike Carr, I don't believe these changes in information consumption habits are automatically negative. (Pessimism is never advantageous.) Instead, these changes are merely different.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is far too soon to begin to see how reading blogs, or using Google is changing us. But, it definitely is changing us. How so, who knows?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We are a product of our time, and our time is indeed an age of blogs and Google.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thecounterculturalist</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:53:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>