<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Blurring Borders - Latest Comments in Traditional Power Structures Still Matter</title><link>http://blurringborders.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://blurringborders.disqus.com/traditional_power_structures_still_matter/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:43:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Traditional Power Structures Still Matter</title><link>http://blurringborders.com/2009/08/05/traditional-power-structures-still-matter/#comment-13982328</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your last point is the best. Quite a zinger.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Without watching the video (TED talks are short, I know; my attention span is shorter), it seems Brown is correct about the overarching effect of new technologies: Foreign policy can never be the same again. But his named cause -- instantaneous digital communication makes it necessary that the masses are heeded -- is off the mark, as you point out. Tech only changes foreign policy by adding just a little more time and political pressure to situations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Consider this: If a US senator complained on Twitter that we weren't doing enough talking with Russia, it would be news for a half-day. If that same senator held a traditional press conference (or met with leaders in private), s/he would have a lot more impact. And that's the same US senator. People like us, even en masse, don't have the power to pressure like a few powerful people do.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex Klein</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:43:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>